A Secret Weapon For criminal case information about laws of pakistan
A Secret Weapon For criminal case information about laws of pakistan
Blog Article
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or even the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
Case legislation is specific on the jurisdiction in which it had been rendered. By way of example, a ruling in a very California appellate court would not commonly be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the discovered counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments given that the issues with the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to your interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) on the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession on the subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to get decided via the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer within the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this factor for interim custody of the subject premises If your petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
This ruling has conditions, and since the petitioners failed a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based about the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances with the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 with the Constitution. Read more
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 from the Constitution based to the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement during the FIR lodged by FIA and while in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
These past decisions are called "case legislation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Allow the decision stand"—could be the principle by which judges are bound to such past decisions, drawing on proven judicial authority to formulate their positions.
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airways Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in the criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically result in exoneration from departmental charges based on the same factual grounds. Though a writ under Article 199 is on the market in specific limited situations, it truly is generally not the appropriate remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full opportunity to cross-take a look at witnesses and present his/her defense but did not influence the department of his/her innocence.
However it is made apparent that police is free to take action against any person that's indulged in criminal activities subject matter to legislation. However no harassment shall be caused for the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of law. Police shall also ensure regard of the family shed in accordance with regulation and when they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they are able to act, so far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall secure concrete evidence and acquire necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate like a issue of security from the house is concerned, which will not be public place under the Act 1977. 9. Thinking about the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has been accomplished. Consequently, this petition is hereby disposed of in the terms stated earlier mentioned. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads forty Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Only the written opinions in the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals are routinely offered. Decisions with the decreased (trial) courts aren't generally published or distributed.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle set up by a court, which other courts are obligated to adhere to.
As a result, this petition is hereby disposed of within the terms stated over. However no harassment shall be caused to either party and the case shall be decided because of the competent court of legislation if pending. Read more
ten. Based to the findings of the inquiry committee, this petition just isn't considered maintainable and is particularly therefore liable to get dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials performing within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case law previously rendered on similar cases.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, It's also a properly-proven proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding lotus case in international law of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is issue towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings on the evidence.